What if AI was a human right?

In a world where AI increasingly shapes the way we live, work, and interact, it is important to consider who gets access and control over this technology. In other words, what if AI was a human right? Would it mean universal access to AI-driven tools and decision-making processes? Would it mandate safeguards to prevent AI from being used as an instrument of oppression?

This thought experiment challenges us to rethink the intersection of technology, ethics, and fundamental human freedoms.

The Case for AI as a Human Right

Human rights, as defined by international conventions, encompass essential freedoms such as the right to education, healthcare, and a dignified standard of living (i.e., the Universal Declaration of Human Rights). In today’s digital age, AI is not necessarily a luxury. It is embedded in systems that dictate who gets a job, what information people see online, and even how justice is administered. Therefore, if access to clean water and education are recognized as fundamental rights because they enable human flourishing, could the same argument apply to AI?

AI as a human right could mean universal access to AI-driven technologies, ensuring that no one is left behind due to socioeconomic disparities. It could also emphasize the importance of algorithmic fairness, guaranteeing transparency and equity in AI-driven decisions that impact people’s lives. Additionally, it could promote digital autonomy, empowering individuals to control how AI influences their personal and professional choices.

The Risks of AI as a Human Right

On the other hand, declaring AI as a human right could introduce new challenges. Who would be responsible for ensuring access? Would it encourage AI dependency, which could potentially widen global inequalities? One significant concern is the concentration of power, as AI is largely controlled by a few corporations and governments. Recognizing AI as a right would require addressing corporate monopolization and ensuring that access is not dictated by private interests.

There are also ethical risks, such as the possibility that AI-enhanced individuals might have more rights or opportunities than those who choose to live without AI, creating new societal divisions. Further, AI requires significant resources, and ensuring global access could place immense strain on infrastructure and environmental sustainability.

A Balanced Approach

While the idea of AI as a human right may seem radical (or even far-fetched), it forces an important discussion about the role AI plays in society. Instead of fully recognizing AI as a human right, governments and organizations could focus on policies that promote AI inclusion and work towards balancing the digital divide, ensuring marginalized communities benefit from AI advancements. Ethical regulation and governance should be a priority, setting standards that prevent AI from deepening existing inequalities. Additionally, investing in AI education and literacy can empower individuals to use AI responsibly, making knowledge about AI accessible to all.

Conclusion

If AI were considered a human right, it could shift the focus from AI as a commercial asset to AI as a public good. While this concept raises complex ethical and logistical challenges, it highlights the need for inclusive AI policies. Whether AI is declared a right or not, ensuring its responsible and equitable deployment should be a global priority.

What do you think? Should AI be a human right, or should access to AI be considered a privilege? Let’s start the conversation.